Big Events, Bigger Risks: How Host Countries Use E-Passport Tech to Manage Inbound Crowds

Big events mean big lines, bigger uncertainty — and higher stakes for identity checks

If you’re planning travel to the 2026 World Cup or another mega-event, your top worries are probably visa headaches, long arrival queues and the risk that a small documentation problem ruins a once-in-a-lifetime trip. Host countries know this — and they’re betting heavily on e-passport gates, facial biometrics and digital visas to speed people through airports and stadiums while cutting fraud. But automation brings trade-offs: privacy concerns, exclusion risks, and technical outages that can paralyze entry lines if planners get them wrong.

What host states are doing now — the 2025–26 push

Since late 2024 and accelerating through 2025, governments preparing for the 2026 FIFA World Cup have announced accelerated rollouts and pilots of automated identity systems across the travel ecosystem. The pattern is clear:

• Mass deployment of ICAO-compliant e-passport gates and biometric kiosks at international arrivals and transit terminals (PKI-based chip verification to verify a passport’s cryptographic signature).
• Wider use of facial recognition at boarding, arrival gates and stadium turnstiles to match a live image to the biometric stored on the e-passport chip.
• Expansion of digital visa (eVisa/eTA) platforms and pre-travel screening that allow authorities to vet visitors before they land.
• Integration pilots under industry frameworks such as IATA One ID to link travel documents, biometrics and ticketing into a single flow.

These measures are being driven by a mix of operators: national border agencies, airport authorities, airlines, and the event organizers. International standard bodies — notably the ICAO Public Key Directory (PKD) — remain crucial: they make e-passport chip verification possible across borders.

Airport tech in practical terms

At major event airports you’ll see several layers of automation working together:

• Automated Passport Control (APC) kiosks and e-gates that read the e-passport’s chip and compare a live photo to the stored biometric.
• Biometric exit/entry checks linked to airline manifests and watchlists so authorities can pre-clear or flag travelers before they reach the gate.
• Mobile onboarding and digital visas that let you upload your passport, visa documents and selfie for pre-travel screening — shortening the in-person encounter at arrival.

U.S. border authorities’ Biometric Entry-Exit program and industry pilots under IATA have both pushed airports and carriers to standardize how biometrics are captured and matched. The result: faster processing — when systems and policies are aligned.

Stadiums and venues: turning ticket lines into identity checkpoints

Event organizers now treat entry as a phase of border control. Typical stadium deployments include:

• Biometric turnstiles that scan a face or QR-coded digital credential to validate ticket + identity in one step.
• Accreditation platforms that issue time-limited digital passes (with embedded biometrics) for staff, media and VIPs.
• Pre-event verification windows where fans can validate identity and visas in advance at pop-up centers or via apps, reducing matchday queues.

Hosts learned from recent summer events where on-site identity validation created bottlenecks; the 2025–26 trend is to shift verification into the pre-travel timeline and to use automated gates that accept both physical e-passports and mobile digital credentials.

How automation changes the security equation: Faster throughput, fewer fake IDs — but new attack surfaces

Automation provides measurable benefits for crowd management and fraud reduction — but it also introduces technical and social risks.

Benefits for crowd management

• Higher throughput: e-gates and biometric lanes process passengers faster than manual checks, reducing dwell time and decongesting terminals.
• Predictable capacity: pre-arrival screening (digital visas, watchlist checks) helps authorities smooth arrivals across time slots, which is vital when millions travel in a narrow window.
• Data-driven flow control: integrated systems can apply real-time queue analytics and redirect passengers to underutilized checkpoints.

How automation reduces fraud

• Crypto-verified e-passports: modern passports contain PKI-signed biometrics; verifying a passport chip against the ICAO PKD prevents many counterfeit/passport-alteration attacks.
• Live-to-chip biometric matching: matching a live selfie to a chip image blocks many forged or stolen-document cases.
• Ticket+ID binding: tying a ticket to a biometric digital credential (or a mobile wallet) reduces ticket resale and credential fraud at stadium gates.

Automating identity checks reduces human error and speeds lines — but automation is only as good as its data, governance and fallbacks.

Real-world considerations: what went right — and wrong — in prior events

Experience matters. Organizers that succeed focus on three practical lessons:

1. Interoperability over novelty: systems that follow ICAO, IATA and national standards often outperform bespoke solutions that can’t exchange certificates or watchlists.
2. Communication is a force-multiplier: well-signposted biometric lanes and clear pre-travel instructions cut confusion and speed adoption among fans unfamiliar with e-passport flows.
3. Robust fallbacks are essential: when biometric systems fail (network outage, liveness failure), manual lanes staffed by trained officers prevent catastrophic queues.

Qatar 2022, the Tokyo Olympics and smaller pilot events demonstrated that biometrics can work at scale — if deployed with careful testing, redundancy and public education. Conversely, events that rushed tech without stress-testing created long delays and public backlash.

Risks and trade-offs — and how to mitigate them

Automation has clear upsides for security and crowd control. But it also raises legitimate concerns travelers should know about — and that hosts must address.

Privacy and data protection

Biometric data is sensitive. Different legal regimes (GDPR in the EU, PIPEDA in Canada, varying privacy frameworks in the U.S. and Mexico) govern collection, storage and cross-border transfer. Practical mitigations include:

• Minimizing retention: only keep biometric matches for the time strictly necessary for the purpose (e.g., the arrival window).
• Transparency: publish clear notices about how long data is stored, who can access it and how requests for deletion are handled.
• Data localization and encryption: host biometric templates in encrypted, access-controlled systems.

Bias and exclusion

Facial recognition performance varies across demographics. Hosts must mitigate false positives/negatives by:

• Testing algorithms across representative populations and adjusting thresholds to reduce disparities.
• Providing non-biometric lanes and assisted processing for those who can’t be verified automatically.

Operational resilience

Outages are inevitable. Good practice: multiple authentication methods (chip + QR + manual), on-site spare hardware, and cross-trained staff who can switch to manual checks quickly.

Practical, actionable advice for travelers heading to mega-events

If you’re traveling to the World Cup or a similar event in 2026, use this checklist to avoid a documentation problem and make the most of entry automation:

• Check for an e-passport chip: most modern passports have the e-passport symbol on the cover. If you don’t have an e-passport, book extra time at arrival and check visa requirements. Some e-gates won’t accept non-chipped passports.
• Confirm passport validity: many countries require six months’ validity beyond your travel dates — and mega-event ticketing or accreditation systems may enforce stricter checks.
• Apply for eVisas/eTAs early: hosts are expanding digital visa platforms; apply well before peak application windows to avoid processing delays.
• Register for trusted-traveler programs when eligible: Global Entry, NEXUS and similar programs can speed re-entry and may qualify you for biometric lanes.
• Follow the host’s pre-travel verification steps: if an organizer asks you to upload a selfie and passport to pre-clear, do it. Pre-cleared travelers typically face much shorter queues.
• Bring backup documentation: printed visas, booking confirmations, and a second photo ID can help if an automated check fails.
• Allow extra time on arrival and departure: even with automation, peak days are busy. Plan for contingencies — and book flights with flexible connections.
• Know your privacy options: read the data notice of the app/visa system you use and understand opt-outs. Ask how long biometric data is retained and how to lodge queries.

Advice for event operators and airports: best practices

Organizers and airports that want to harness automation with minimal disruption should focus on three domains:

1. Interoperability and standards

Adopt ICAO and IATA standards to ensure e-passport chip verification and biometric matching work across carriers and borders. Use the ICAO PKD and industry profiles rather than closed vendor solutions where possible.

2. Failover and human-in-the-loop design

Design systems so a failed biometric check redirects people smoothly to assisted lanes. Cross-train staff to take over identity checks without creating bottlenecks.

3. Transparent public communication

Publish clear, multilingual instructions about what travelers must do before arrival, how long the process takes, and what happens if automation fails. Use visuals and short videos to show the biometric flow.

Future predictions — what’s next after 2026?

Looking ahead from 2026, these trends will shape the next generation of travel identity and event security:

• Digital identity wallets: mobile wallets storing cryptographically signed identity and ticketing credentials — privacy-preserving and interoperable across borders.
• Decentralized identity primitives: standards like verifiable credentials will reduce centralized biometric data repositories, lowering privacy risk.
• Wider adoption of One ID: industry convergence around IATA One ID and similar frameworks will make seamless door-to-door travel more realistic.
• AI-driven anomaly detection: pattern recognition will help spot identity fraud and suspicious travel patterns — but must be governed to avoid discriminatory outcomes.

Final takeaways — what travelers and hosts must remember

For travelers: automated identity systems are intended to make your journey faster — but they won’t fix a missing visa, an expired passport or a too-tight connection. Use pre-travel verification and trusted-traveler programs where available; carry backups and give yourself time.

For hosts and operators: the tech works best when it’s interoperable, privacy-aware, and designed with human fallbacks. Automation should be an amplifier of good policy, not a substitute for it.

Resources

• International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) — e-passport and biometric standards
• IATA One ID — industry roadmap for identity in travel
• U.S. CBP Biometric Programs — Biometric Entry-Exit program information

Call to action

If you’re headed to a mega-event in 2026, start now: confirm your passport has an e-passport chip, apply for any required e-visas, and register for trusted-traveler programs when eligible. Want alerts about last-minute airport and stadium entry changes? Subscribe to our travel alerts and get concise, official guidance straight to your inbox before you fly.

Related Reading

• How Regional Brand Pullouts Change Cleanser Formulas: The K-Beauty Example
• Bose vs Amazon: Best Bluetooth Micro Speakers Compared at New Record Lows
• Training Tutors in Conflict-Avoidant Feedback: Two Calm Phrases That Improve Learning Outcomes
• CES 2026 Picks Gamers Should Actually Buy Right Now
• Tiny Home Office: Use an Apple Mac mini M4 and a Smart Lamp for a Minimal, Powerful Setup